Tribunal administratif du logement
You are here :
Each application filed with the Tribunal administratif du logement is assessed by a master of the rolls. The assessment criteria are essentially based on the remedies sought, as well as the objects (conclusions sought) and the reasons set out in the application (grounds for the application).
The master of the rolls determines the time required to hear the application, which varies based on the complexity of the application. During the assessment, the application is also placed in a specific category.
At that time, the plaintiff’s profile (lessee or lessor) is not taken into consideration.
There are five categories of hearings:
The non-payment of rent category is comprised of applications for the resiliation of a lease following failure to pay the rent.
Rent fixing or revision involves applications concerning annual rent increases.
Urgent civil cases involve evictions, lease assignments and orders for execution of the obligations of a party to the lease. This category also includes applications for the repossession of a dwelling or eviction of a lessee who is 60 years of age or over.
Priority civil cases involve applications for the resiliation of a lease for reasons other than non-payment of rent.
General civil cases concern disputes that do not involve the occupation of the dwelling (e.g. damages or a rent reduction).
In assessing an application, if the reasons given involve risks to the occupants’ health or safety, the master of the rolls systematically considers such applications as urgent civil cases.
The party’s reasons should, therefore, be clearly set out in the application, since the master of the roll relies on the form in assessing each application. If no health or safety issues are spelled out, none will be considered by the master of the rolls in determining the category to which the case belongs.
Once an application has been filed, an amendment must be filed in order for the master of the rolls to consider any changes to the initial situation. In such cases, the master of the rolls reassesses the case, which may result in it being moved to a category that is processed more quickly.
The time required to obtain an initial hearing varies, depending on the category. As number of factors result in the first-come, first-served rule not being applied systematically.
Here are a few examples: