Tribunal administratif du logement
Change language
Menu
You are here :
The Tribunal makes summaries of decisions on various topics available to you.
That tool could be useful to prepare your application or as part of a conciliation session. For example, it could help you estimate the amount of damages to which you are entitled or the nature of the orders likely to be issued by the Tribunal.
The following examples of judgements are provided for information purposes only.
Several factors can influence an administrative judge’s decision. For example, a clause provided for in the lease, the relevance and quality of the evidence provided, etc. In summary, each case is different and each decision depends on the evidence submitted to the Tribunal.
Issue
Access to the dwelling
Condition of the premises
The lessor applies for:
The parties came to an agreement.
The lessee cannot deny the lessor access to her dwelling to verify its condition on the ground that she fears the possible consequences of COVID-19, but the lessor must respect the following rules: wash his hands (or disinfect them) before entering the dwelling, wear gloves and a mask, and comply with the rules of social distancing of 2 metres.
Héon c. Delmaire (June 11, 2020)
Comings and goings in the dwelling
Social distancing
Non-compliance with the directives
The lessor applies for resiliation of the lease.
The lease is resiliated.
In failing to comply with the health rules ordered by the authorities to reduce the spread of COVID-19, the lessee and his visitors compromised the health and safety of the lessor.
These exceptional circumstances justify the resiliation of the lease, notwithstanding the Ministerial Order Concerning the ordering of measures to protect the health of the population during the COVID-19 pandemic situation, adopted on March 17, 2020.
Testa c. Leblanc (June 16, 2020)
Services provided to lessees
Superior force
Refusal to take possession of leased premises
The lessees apply for:
(monthly rent is $2,957)
The Tribunal:
On the date of delivery of the dwelling located in a prestigious complex, the lessees were unable to benefit from most of the services mentioned in the lease due to superior force constituted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
In refusing to take possession of the dwelling, they did not act in bad faith. The pandemic, according to the governmental orders in council and orders made, would have confined them in a dwelling where they would have been unable to benefit from the anticipated services.
The lessor is therefore released from its obligation to deliver the dwelling and the lessees are authorized to apply for resiliation of the lease.
Boisé Notre-Dame c. Monté (February 17, 2021)
Services offered to lessees
Rent reduction
The lessee applies for:
(monthly rent is $1,865)
The Tribunal awards:
The dwelling is located in a prestigious building, which includes the following services: an indoor pool with locker rooms and showers, a gym with machines and a training room, a rooftop terrace with a barbecue, and a billiards room.
The lessor was forced to close access to common areas due to the government orders and the lockdown imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Since the pandemic must be treated as a case of superior force, the lessee may be exempted from paying the portion of the rent corresponding to the services from which he could not benefit.
Bigeault c. 9891200 Canada inc. (March 17, 2021)
Private seniors' residence
Services offered
The lessee applied for:
(monthly rent is $2,191)
The Tribunal awarded the lessee:
The lessor’s obligation to provide peaceful enjoyment of the leased property is characterized as an “obligation of result”. The only way to be relieved from this responsibility is to prove that the prejudice was caused by superior force.
The interruption of recreation services because of the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes superior force. Nevertheless, the lessee is entitled to restitution of part of the rent paid during this period.
The lessee is entitled to a rent reduction of $150 a month.
Lacroix c. Résidence Le Jules Verne (October 21, 2021)
Access to dwelling
Lessee's refusal
COVID-19 – unvaccinated person
The lessee cannot refuse access to the person designated by the lessor to carry out the work because that person is not vaccinated against COVID-19.
First, this would hinder the lessor's management right. Second, the vaccination of citizens, although recommended by public health authorities, is not mandatory.
However, the lessor has not established that the lessee's behaviour had caused her serious injury justifying the resiliation of the lease.
Chartrand c. Côté Lemire (January 19, 2022)
Note to reader: The above examples of decisions were selected and summarized by SOQUIJ. In rare instances, they may have been appealed from before a higher court. If you wish to cite one of those judgments before a tribunal, it is recommended that you check the plumitif of the courthouse in question.
If need be, you can consult other decisions with regard to dwelling leases by using the search engine (in French only) available free of charge on the SOQUIJ website. For best results, simply select a tribunal (e.g. Tribunal administratif du logement), and enter French key words such as “bruit” (noise), “moisissure” (mould), “zoothérapie” (animal therapy), “résiliation” (resiliation), “expulsion” (eviction), etc.
Protecting your personal information
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible browsing experience. Some cookies are essential to the proper functioning of our website and therefore cannot be deactivated.
We also use non-essential cookies particularly to analyze your browsing behaviour in order to enhance our website’s performance. For more information, please see our Policy on Privacy.